A Kripke-like Model for Negation as Failure
نویسنده
چکیده
We extend the Kripke-like model theory given in 10] for a fragment of rst-order hereditary Harrop formulae to include negated atoms in goals. This gives us a formal framework in which to study the role of Negation as Failure rule. The class of predicates for which Negation As Failure is applicable is discussed, as well as the predicates for which some other form of negation will need to be used. We show how the former class may be incorporated into the model theory, giving a generalisation of the usual T ! construction. No restriction on the class of programs is needed for this approach; the construction may be used for programs which are not locally stratiiedd14]. This is accomplished by the use of a success level and a failure level of a goal, either or both of which may be innnite. The resulting T operator is not monotonic, which necessitates a slight departure from the standard procedure, but the important properties of the construction still hold.
منابع مشابه
Truth Values and Connectives in Some Non-Classical Logics
The question as to whether the propositional logic of Heyting, which was a formalization of Brouwer's intuitionistic logic, is finitely many valued or not, was open for a while (the question was asked by Hahn). Kurt Gödel (1932) introduced an infinite decreasing chain of intermediate logics, which are known nowadays as Gödel logics, for showing that the intuitionistic logic is not finitely (man...
متن کاملOn hereditary Harrop formulae as a basis for logic programming
This thesis examines the use of first-order hereditary Harrop formulae, a generalisation of Horn clauses due to Miller, as a foundation for logic programming. As this framework is constructive, this will sometimes dictate an approach whicli differs slightly from the traditional (classical) one. We discuss the foundational problems involved in adding negation to the framework of first-order here...
متن کاملLogic of Negation-Complete Interactive Proofs (Formal Theory of Epistemic Deciders)
We produce a decidable classical normal modal logic of internalised negation-complete or disjunctive non-monotonic interactive proofs (LDiiP) from an existing logical counterpart of non-monotonic or instant interactive proofs (LiiP). LDiiP internalises agent-centric proof theories that are negation-complete (maximal) and consistent (and hence strictly weaker than, for example, Peano Arithmetic)...
متن کاملExtending Negation As Failure by Abduction: A Three-Valued Stable Model Semantics
I> In this paper, we propose a semantics for logic programs with negation as failure, the Finite Failure Stable Model semantics (FF-SM semantics), which is a three-valued extension of Gelfond and Lifschitz' Stable Model semantics. FF-SM semantics is defined in the style of Gelfond and Lifschitz Stable Model semantics, but it builds on an underlying Kripke/Kleene semantics, in which loops causin...
متن کاملCircumscribing Embedded Implications (without Stratications) Special Issue on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning
This paper is a study of circumscription, not in classical logic, as usual, but in intuitionistic logic. We rst review the intuitionistic circumscription of Horn clause logic programs, which was discussed in previous work, and we then consider the larger class of embedded implications. The ordinary circumscription axiom turns out to be inappropriate for this class of rules, and we analyze two a...
متن کامل